Best Running Shoes (2026): 11 Expert-Tested Pairs For All Types Of Terrain

At a Glance 

• Bouncy, responsive midsole
• Breathable mesh upper
• Racing-inspired aesthetic
• Ideal for road running

While it boasts an attractive aesthetic, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL didn’t earn our best overall nomination because of its looks, outright. This well-designed running shoe checks the boxes for stability, comfort, and performance, earning an impressive overall score of 4.4 out of 5. 

GGR Editor and resident footwear guru Ben Emminger, NASM-CNC, NASM-CSNC, had high praise for the Adizero EVO SLs after extensive testing. 

“The midsole foam is well-cushioned yet energetic enough for sprint intervals, and I really appreciate the flexibility at play with the engineered mesh upper,” he told me, rating the construction and durability at a near-perfect 4.5 out of 5. “It’s breathable enough for warm runs yet stretchy enough to accommodate thicker socks.”

Appearance: 4/5

Stability & Performance: 4/5

Value: 5/5

Why We Like the Adidas Adizero EVO SL

Right off the bat (or out of the box, in this case), the Adizero EVO SLs made a strong first impression with Ben.

“To me, this is one of the sharpest designs Adidas has put out in a while,” he notes, rating the design and appearance at 4 out of 5. “ I really enjoy the simple yet exaggerated three stripes along the lateral (outer) side of the shoe, and they have a clean geometry that, overall, matches my footprint well.” 

The EVO SLs back up that visual appeal with specific design elements that make it ideal for road running workouts; namely, the LIGHTSTRIKE midsole. 

“It’s bouncy enough that you want to almost pick up the pace, yet cushioned and responsive enough to keep your steps cozy,” Ben told me of this foam that borrows heavily from the brand’s super shoe lineup. “I’m really looking forward to warmer weather and getting these out for higher mileage.” 

At a price point of roughly $150, these shoes deliver incredible value, too. Ben awards a 5 out of 5 in this category, stating, “I feel you definitely get your money’s worth with the EVO SLs, and I’d be happy to keep these in my rotation for seasons to come. Plus, Adidas offers these runners in a variety of sizes and colorways, so you’re sure to find a pair that matches your dimensions and style perfectly.”

Alternatives

If versatility is your priority, you should probably look elsewhere. Ben rated the EVO SLs a 3.5 out of 5 in this area, noting that the outsole design limits their effectiveness on trails. 

“I’d never plan to hit the mountains or bogs in these sneakers, but these can be a versatile pick for those in need of a do-it-all road runner that’s effective enough for varying paces and distances,” he told me. 

In addition, the absence of guide rails—elements found in a running shoes’ midsole designed to help control your foot’s motion—makes these less than ideal for athletes who deal with overpronation. Still, Ben says the neutral ride is the “perfect blend of energy and comfort,” and the only instability issues he experienced occurred with ultra-thin socks. 

“With the right lacing setup, you can definitely achieve that locked-in feel for improved performance,” he adds.

If you want a shoe that’s built for more than just running, check out the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4, which earned a 4-out-of-5 versatility rating in testing. 

Testing Breakdown

Here’s how the Adidas Adizero EVO SL performed based on our testing methodology. Other than versatility, it scored at least a 4 or higher in all categories. 

Vs. The Average

The Adidas Adizero EVO SLs are priced almost on par with the average running shoe while offering a lighter profile and slightly lower heel-to-toe drop (but not by much).

At a Glance 

• Breathable mesh upper
• Wide toe box
• Aerodynamic midsole geometry
• Ultra-lightweight design

The Maverick-V1 Runner stands out as the top neutral running shoe thanks to its lightweight construction, ultra-responsive cushioning, and TYRTAC rubber outsole that provides a reliable grip. Earning a perfect stability and performance score of 5 out of 5, these shoes live up to their marketing claims by being incredibly light and springy.

After training with these for more than six months, GGR Director of Content Nicole Davis, CPT, PN1-NC, hasn’t seen any visible signs of wear, even after washing them. Most importantly, she’s still blown away by how they feel during use.

“You feel less impact and like you’re spending more time in the air,” she told me. “It’s actually wild…I don’t know what kind of physics they figured out here, but kudos!”

Appearance: 4/5

Stability & Performance: 5/5

Value: 5/5

Why We Like the TYR Maverick-V1 Runner

Weighing 7.7 ounces—roughly 1.5 ounces lighter than the average running shoe—the Maverick-V1 Runners will make you feel fleet on your feet, according to Nicole. 

“These things feel so light, both figuratively as well as from a breathability perspective,” she told me, rating the construction and durability at a 4.5 out of 5. “The FLIGHTTIME foam cushioning is supposed to help with shock absorption, and I totally think it does; I feel about 20 pounds lighter on my feet when I wear these.” 

These shoes also feature a wider toe box, which can be great if you have flat feet, bunions, or other foot-related issues that may require more width for better comfort.

Available for $150, the Maverick-V1 Runner earned a perfect value rating from Nicole, as well. 

“These are well worth the money, and I’d repurchase them as an everyday running shoe,” she notes. “Also, they sent a really cool PR package for these shoes, including a scale for you to weigh the actual shoe itself, as one of the selling points is how light they are.”

Alternatives

Unfortunately for Nicole, the Maverick-V1 Runners made a painful first impression. “They absolutely tore up my heels the first two times I wore them—just destroyed,” she told me. “I had to bandage up and wear long running socks a few times after that, but I pushed through it. I’m glad I did because now I absolutely love these and reach for them anytime I go on a run.” 

Furthermore, while these shoes work great for running and walking, they aren’t meant for lifting or other activities. Nicole docked a few points off the versatility score, settling for a 3.5 out of 5.

“You can run and walk in these, but otherwise, I’d choose a different option,” she explained. “I will say, though, that I’m also doing my first HYROX in June and have decided I’m going to train in these because they’re that good…we’ll see how it goes!”

The Maverick-V1 Runner isn’t the only shoe that features excellent cushioning. You could also consider the Adidas Adizero EVO SL if you’re searching for a similarly priced option.

Testing Breakdown

The TYR Maverick-V1 Runner earned high scores across the board, including perfect marks for stability and value. Here’s a complete breakdown by category. 

Vs. The Average

The TYR Maverick-V1 Runner is about the same price as the average running shoe. Its lightweight design and slightly higher heel-to-toe drop make it quite comfortable to train in, too.

At a Glance 

• High heel-to-toe drop
• Soft and dynamic cushioning
• GuideRails Technology System for trusted support
• Ideal for heel strikers

The best stability running shoes can help alleviate issues like overpronation¹ (where your foot rolls inward excessively) by providing extra support and structure in the midsole and arch area. If you have flat feet, low arches, or simply need more support, we recommend the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25. With a 10-millimeter heel-to-toe drop and a blend of soft and dynamic cushioning, these shoes earned a 4.5-out-of-5 rating for stability and performance.

Value: 4.5/5

Stability & Performance: 4.5/5

Appearance & Design: 3.5/5

Why We Like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

GGR Managing Editor Amanda Dvorak, CPT, CNC, may not be a competitive runner, but she’s well aware of how certain running shoes can exacerbate problems like overpronation. Luckily, the GTS 25s have useful design elements that make running more enjoyable and comfortable for her. 

“There’s nitrogen-infused DNA Loft V3 cushioning in the heel and forefoot, and a mesh upper that feels pretty breathable,” Amanda told me, rating the construction and durability at 4 out of 5. “It feels like I have plenty of room in the toe box, but I go up half a size in these to account for my feet swelling a bit as I run.” 

Amanda has tried several other stability shoes, yet she keeps coming back to Brooks. “They are the only shoes I’ve run in that don’t make my feet or knees hurt, outside of some mild general post-workout soreness,” she says. 

For those concerned about adjustments and comfort, Brooks offers these shoes in four widths: Medium, Narrow, Wide, and Extra Wide. The GTS 25s also come in half sizes from 5 to 12, which gives you ample flexibility to find the right fit. We rate the adjustments and comfort at 4.5 out of 5.

“I use the heel lock lacing method, which I think also helps my foot feel pretty stable when I run in these,” Amanda told me. “In addition to wearing them for runs, I have also worn them all day running errands, and they’re pretty comfortable.” 

Alternatives

Although she enjoys using the GTS 25s, Amanda does have one construction callout: the insoles. She replaced the stock ones with a different brand for better support.

“The few times I have tried to run in them with the included insoles, I definitely noticed some discomfort in my arches,” she told me.

Additionally, while Amanda rates the versatility at a 4 out of 5, the GTS 25s wouldn’t be on her short list of options for serious strength training.

“These might work for light lifting or bodyweight movements in the gym, and maybe even some upper body work, but I wouldn’t wear them for heavy squats or deadlifts,” she adds.

The Adrenaline GTS 25 isn’t necessarily the most stylish running shoe. If aesthetics matter more than stability, we recommend the Altra Torin 8, which earned a perfect score for appearance and design.

Testing Breakdown

Here’s how the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 performed based on our testing methodology. Other than appearance and design, these shoes earned at least a 4 out of 5 in every category. 

Vs. The Average

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25s are essentially the same price as the average running shoe. They have a significantly higher heel-to-toe drop, though, making them well-suited for heel strikers or those with Achilles issues.

At a Glance 

• Soft, bouncy ride
• Made for high-wear zones
• Premium foam midsole
• Available in regular, wide, or extra-wide fits

Also known for making some of the best walking shoes, HOKA delivered another winner with the Bondi 9—our pick for the best cushioned running shoe. Featuring ultra-plush SCF EVA midsole foam, these shoes have quickly become a favorite of GGR Senior Staff Writer Amanda Capritto, CPT, CES, CNC, CF-L1, CSNC. 

“Pretty much every time I plan to be ambulatory for more than a few minutes, I’m slipping these on,” she told me, giving the Bondi 9 a perfect 5-out-of-5 rating for adjustments and comfort. “I’ve loved them for walking on my under-desk walking pad, walking the dogs, and running errands. These are some of the most comfortable sneakers I’ve ever worn, especially as an everyday shoe.”

Appearance: 4.5/5

Comfort: 5/5

Value: 3/5

Why We Like the HOKA Bondi 9 

Looks aren’t everything, but they certainly matter when it comes to footwear. Amanda gives the Bondi 9 a 4.5 out of 5 for appearance and design, though she admits the aesthetic may not be for everyone. 

“I personally love the chunky look of these shoes,” she told me. “They go with everything and look as great with running clothes as they do with around-town clothes. Plus, there are more than a dozen colors to choose from.” 

Amanda was also impressed by the construction and durability of these HOKA shoes, awarding a score of 4 out of 5 in this category. 

“I’ve been wearing these pretty much nonstop since I got them (my pregnant feet and hips appreciate the cushion) and wear is normal, if not better than average,” she explained to me. “I’ve done more than 100 total miles in them between workouts, walks, and wearing them around town for errands, and I can just barely start to see the midsole compressing a bit.” 

Another reason these shoes made the cut is HOKA’s customer-oriented mindset. The company’s “Fly for 30” program means you can actually wear the shoes how you normally would for 30 days. If you don’t like them, you can return them with no headaches. As a result, we give the brand a 5-out-of-5 rating for customer experience.

“If you join the free membership program, you get even more perks,” Amanda told me. “I previously had to return a pair for a sizing issue and it couldn’t have been easier.”

Alternatives

The biggest knock against the Bondi 9 is the price. Or, in Amanda’s words, “Yikes! Not cheap!” 

At a list price of roughly $175, these shoes are among the most expensive we’ve had in testing. And while you can get certain colorways for much less as they’re being phased out (Amanda’s seen them as low as $140), this is definitely not the ideal choice if you’re operating on a tight budget. 

“The value is not great, but fair, and worth it if you want to sink into clouds with every step,” Amanda adds, rating the value at a 3 out of 5. 

Speaking of clouds, the unspectacular stability and performance score of 3 out of 5 exposes some of the shortcomings of this shoe. Amanda recommends looking elsewhere if you need extra support. 

“My mom also has these and she has arch issues; she had to stop wearing them to her nursing job because they weren’t supportive enough for her to be on her feet all day,” she told me. “You kind of sink into them., which, again, my pregnant joints love, but they’re definitely not stability shoes.”

While we love the aesthetics and comfort of the Bondi 9, you should consider something like the Altra Experience Flow 2 if you want better stability and performance. These shoes earned a much higher score in that category and may be a better match for your feet.

Testing Breakdown

Here’s how the HOKA Bondi 9 performed across all categories we evaluate running shoes in. Although it only earned an average rating for stability, it earned a perfect score for adjustments and comfort.

Vs. The Average

The HOKA Bondi 9s are more expensive than the average running shoe by roughly $20. The 5-millimeter heel-to-toe drop is slightly lower than the average, as well, making them a good option for runners who favor a more natural foot strike. 

At a Glance 

• Trampoline-inspired outsole design
• Excellent cushioning
• Neutral support
• Available in Standard and Wide sizes

While I have no plans to run a 5K every day, I’ll admit the Novablast 5s inspired me to pencil more casual runs into my workout routine. ASICS designed these shoes for daily training with thoughtful elements like an 8-millimeter heel-to-toe drop, FF BLAST MAX cushioning, and a breathable mesh upper that made this non-runner actually enjoy hitting the pavement. I rate the stability and performance at a rock-solid 4 out of 5, primarily due to the responsive cushioning that helps provide a lightweight, energetic ride.

Construction & Durability: 4/5

Stability & Performance: 4/5

Value: 4.5/5

Why We Like the ASICS Novablast 5

As someone who’s primarily relied on rugby/soccer cleats and Nike Metcons for my athletic endeavors, I was eager to see if the hype about ASICS was warranted. After wearing the Novablast 5s for one- and two-mile runs, walking, and some HIIT sessions, I can confirm these are an excellent option for daily training. 

Available in both Standard and Wide options, I went with the latter because I have bunions on the outside of my feet that require a roomier toe box. I was pleased that, unlike my Metcons, the Novablast 5s gave me enough space to splay my toes without feeling cramped. In addition, the cushioning helps take some of the load off my knees and ankles—something I particularly appreciate as a larger athlete who tips the scales at about 230 pounds. Overall, I rate the construction and durability at a 4 out of 5. 

At $150, these are right on par with what you should expect to pay for a high-quality running shoe. Although I wouldn’t necessarily spend that type of money on a pair of dedicated cardio kicks, anyone who runs regularly should feel confident about making that investment because of the Novablast 5’s high-quality construction and reliable performance. Accordingly, I rate the value at a near-perfect 4.5 out of 5. 

Alternatives

While they’re by no means unattractive, I wouldn’t call the Novablast 5s the most stylish shoe. That said, I didn’t exactly choose the most aesthetic option (I went with the all-black version), so part of that falls on me. Still, ASICS offers these in 20 colorways, including several brightly colored options that can add a lot more pop than my basic black selection. 

While you could wear these as part of an athleisure look, they definitely have the aesthetic of a running shoe, so I think they’re less versatile than my Nike Metcons, which I wear for workouts and going out for social gatherings. I’ll settle on a conservative 3.5-out-of-5 appearance and design rating for the Novablast 5s. 

I also gave the same rating for versatility. These work great for running, walking, or daily use. In fact, I find myself wearing them quite often for running errands or non-training activities because it feels like I’m walking on a cloud. It’s a night-and-day difference compared to my Metcons that can feel “harsh” on your feet after many hours. 

However, the cushioning makes these less-than-ideal for weightlifting. I prefer a flat shoe for deadlifts, squats, and general strength training, so I’d opt for something else if that was my primary focus.

If you’re in the market for a daily trainer, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is another great option that costs the same as the Novablast 5. 

Testing Breakdown

Although the ASICS Novablast 5 isn’t (subjectively) the most stylish shoe, it earned solid marks across the board, including a 4.5-out-of-5 rating for value. 

Vs. The Average

The ASICS Novablast 5s cost just a few dollars less than the average running shoe. The most notable difference, though, is the generous 90-day return policy that far exceeds the industry standard. 

At a Glance 

• Great for daily training
• Breathable mesh upper
• PUMAGRIP rubber outsole offers excellent traction
• No wide options available

Just like the best budget gym equipment can get the job done without costing you an arm and a leg, the PUMA Velocity NITRO 4s can support your running endeavors at a more manageable price point. While they’re cheaper than other shoes on this list, that doesn’t mean they’re ill-equipped for daily training. In fact, GGR Editor Ben Emminger, NASM-CNC, NASM-CSNC, had some high praise for these budget-oriented shoes. He rated their value a 4 out of 5.

“At roughly 8.6 ounces, the Velocity NITRO 4 can be a good pick for tempo days or sprint intervals, but I was pleased with its performance in daily training intensities, too,” he told me. “The NITROFOAM midsole has a good sense of snap to it, so faster turn-overs are fun and enjoyable without feeling overbuilt for slower paces.”

Appearance: 3.5/5

Stability: 4/5

Value: 4/5

Why We Like the PUMA Velocity NITRO 4

Marketed as a daily trainer/tempo trainer for neutral or slight pronation, the Velocity NITRO 4 lived up to that billing during testing. 

“I felt this was pretty accurate, and didn’t feel like the shoe was overcompensating in one direction or the other,” Ben told me. “I kept this to paved roadways and sidewalks and had no issues with stability or side-to-side movement, and I really enjoy how tacky and controlled the PUMAGRIP rubber outsole is across varying surfaces.” 

Furthermore, the narrower fitment helps create a locked-in feel that can improve on-foot stability and security. While Ben cautions that this may be potentially uncomfortable for wider-footed athletes, he rates the stability and performance at a rock-solid 4 out of 5, noting that the mesh upper is also stretchy enough at the toe box to allow for comfortable splaying. 

Similarly, Ben rates the construction and durability at a 4 out of 5. “I’ve yet to log too many miles with these kicks, but I don’t feel as if they’ll prematurely wear out,” he told me. 

Alternatives

Ben’s major callout with these shoes is the visual appeal—or lack thereof. While 15 color choices give you some room to find your ideal style, the synthetic overlays on the upper and fire-like accent on the heel counter feel gimmickier than what he’d prefer in a training shoe. 

“I don’t feel like this design translates as well as other shoes in my rotation,” Ben told me. As a result, he docked a few points off the appearance and design score, settling on a 3.5 out of 5.

In addition to not being the most aesthetically pleasing shoe, the Velocity NITRO 4 isn’t the most versatile, either. 

“The 10-millimeter stack height and somewhat plush midsole make this a no-go for in-gym lifting,” Ben explained to me. “The narrower last also would limit your ability to create that stable base for foundational lifts like squats and deadlifts, so it’s best to save these for cardio sessions.”

For a better combination of aesthetics and versatility, take a look at the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4. These shoes earned a perfect score for appearance and a 4 out of 5 for versatility.

Testing Breakdown

The PUMA Velocity NITRO 4 didn’t blow us away in any one particular area, but it met our threshold for at least a 3 out of 5 in every category. 

Vs. The Average

The PUMA Velocity NITRO 4s are more affordable than the average running shoe by about $15. Available in roughly the same size range, these shoes feature a larger heel-to-toe drop by about 4.6 millimeters. 

At a Glance 

• Wider foot-shaped toe box
• Tire-tread-inspired outsole
• Ulta-lightweight design
• 5,000-mile sole warranty

Running enthusiasts who also enjoy strength training don’t necessarily have to purchase a separate pair of weightlifting shoes. After all, the Xero HFS II can function well for activities that don’t revolve around cardiovascular fitness. This zero-drop running shoe earned a 4.5-out-of-5 versatility rating from GGR Editor Ben Emminger, NASM-CNC, NASM-CSNC, who’s intimately familiar with all types of footwear. 

“I’ve worn these for a handful of in-gym sessions and do appreciate how stable I can get before a heavy deadlift,” he told me. 

Construction: 4/5

Versatility: 4.5/5

Value: 4/5

Why We Like the Xero HFS II

What may be a drawback for some could be a benefit for others. In this case, the lack of a midsole actually plays in favor of the HFS II’s versatility. You can certainly run or walk in them (provided you’re accustomed to barefoot running) and the flat base also provides an excellent sense of grounding in the gym.

“I could also see these being a worthwhile daily shoe for barefoot enthusiasts, as the rubber outsole provides enough tread and traction for varying terrain without feeling too elevated or cushioned,” Ben told me. “Of course, this is a specialist shoe that isn’t for everyone, but if you do follow the barefoot lifestyle, this is a definite do-it-all profile.”

In addition, Ben notes that the revamped rubber outsole has held up well, and while he’s always appreciated Xero’s simple yet breathable mesh upper, the latest version of the HFS takes things to another level.

“The original HFS was a thicker mesh over the top of the foot, but I feel that this latest iteration has thinned out the textile appropriately without losing its breathable, flexible qualities,” he told me.

Lastly, we’d be remiss without calling attention to Xero’s fantastic customer service. The company offers a 5,000-mile sole warranty, which is a unique service you don’t often see with other running shoes. Additionally, the customer service department has all available contact information well-displayed on the brand site, even down to addresses for corporate offices. 

“Add in that Xero offers free shipping on orders $99+ (what you’re likely already paying for a pair of shoes) and it’s one of the best customer experiences I’ve had with footwear,” Ben adds.

Alternatives

If you’re looking for the most comfortable running shoe, the HFSI II is not it, especially if you’re unfamiliar with barefoot training. 

“There’s very little between your soles and your running pavement, meaning you’re bound to feel some impact across your feet and joints,” Ben told me, rating the adjustments and comfort at 3.5 out of 5. “If you’re curious about barefoot training in the HFS IIs, my suggestion is to take it slow and keep it to moderate paces and shorter distances at the start.” 

Alternatively, Ben suggests a minimal drop (1-2 mm) or a shoe with a more pronounced midsole foam as a “good stepping stone approach” for barefoot beginners.

You shouldn’t expect maximum stability from the HFS II, either. The minimalist design means you’re at the mercy of your natural gait, so there are no guide rails or underfoot foam materials to help correct any missteps. We rate the stability and performance at a solid-but-unspectacular 3.5 out of 5. 

“This can be a great sensation for those accustomed to barefoot running, but I’d be cautious about dramatically shifting your shoes all at once,” Ben told me. “if you do overpronate regularly, it’s likely best to continue your shopping journey.”

The HFS II may not check the boxes for appearance, but the Altra Torin 8 earned a perfect score in this category. So, if you want to go the zero-drop route, you could roll with the Altras, instead.

Testing Breakdown

The Xero HFS II scored at least a 3.5 out of 5 in every category we tested. However, it’s also noteworthy that it’s the only pair of shoes on this list that didn’t earn a perfect score in any area. 

Vs. The Average

The Xero HFS II is more affordable than the average running shoe by about $25. That said, the zero-drop design sets it apart from other running shoes, making it much more versatile for other types of training.

At a Glance 

• Durable mesh upper
• Plush midsole cushion
• 0-millimeter drop
• FootPod technology supports sole flexibility

When it came time to find the best running shoe option for wider-footed athletes, we zeroed in on a product that also made our list of the best Altra running shoes—the Altra Torin 8. This zero-drop shoe caters to those who need more space to splay with a roomier, more natural toe box geometry. Plus, the Torin 8s come in Standard and Wide sizes to accommodate those who need a more spacious fit.

GGR Senior Editor and seasoned runner Cait Giddings wore the Altra Torin 8s during marathon training and was highly impressed with their durable upper, versatile midsole, and grippy outsole, awarding a perfect stability and performance score of 5 out of 5.

“The cushioning is very plush but bouncy and geared toward both tempo runs and long runs,” she told me. “It felt fast, but with lots of forgiving cushion for 20-milers.” 

Appearance & Design: 5/5

Stability & Performance: 5/5

Value: 5/5

Why We Like the Altra Torin 8

Our team has been impressed by many of Altra’s offerings because of their build quality, and the Torin 8s are no different. Cait gave them a perfect 5-out-of-5 rating for construction and durability, noting that the upper stayed in pristine condition even after months of heavy use. She also noted that the grippy outsole showed “almost no signs of wear” after 100 miles. 

“The midsole is stacked high and well-cushioned, too, but didn’t feel like it was losing any of its bounce, compression, and firmness over time the way a lot of these shoes with maximalist midsoles tend to,” she told me. 

For those with width concerns, fear not: The Torin 8s are built with that in mind, as well. 

“I love how wide the toe box is on these. I don’t have a wide foot, but my toes fan out and tend to crowd the toe box of narrower shoe brands,” Cait told me. “Altras have such a roomy, generous toe box, and my forefoot had plenty of real estate to relax, splay out, and breathe. I appreciate that these are so spacious without looking like clown shoes.” 

As such, we rate the adjustments and comfort at a perfect 5 out of 5. 

Alternatives

Cait typically runs with a 5-millimeter heel-toe offset, so the zero-drop Altras represented a pretty substantial design shift. She told me she struggled a bit to get acclimated to the Torin 8s, noting, “This required some adjustment and led to me feeling more like I was sitting back on my heels than running on my midfoot, though the shoes were designed to encourage the opposite.”. 

Furthermore, it’s worth noting that the customer reviews for the Torin 8s are mixed. These shoes have earned an average rating of 3.8 stars on the company website, which exemplifies how there are varying opinions about the comfort and performance of a zero-drop shoe. 

The Torin 8s aren’t the only zero-drop shoe worth considering. If that’s your preference, we recommend the more budget-friendly Xero HFS II, which costs about $30 less.

Testing Breakdown

The Altra Torin 8s earned impressive scores across the board, posting perfect ratings in five categories. Here’s a complete breakdown of how they measured up against our testing methodology.

Vs. The Average

The Altra Torin 8s are slightly more expensive than the average running shoe, but not by a significant margin. The main difference is the zero-drop design, which may be suitable for some runners and uncomfortable for others.

At a Glance 

• Available in standard and wide sizes
• Plush midsole
• Compatible with gaiters
• Works for beginner and advanced trails

Studies show² that trail running may be more beneficial than road running for neuromuscular function and aerobic capacity. So, if you’re tired of pounding the pavement, investing in a pair of the best trail running shoes and exploring a more scenic route could be a game-changer for your fitness routine. If that sounds like your idea of a mentally and physically rewarding workout, we recommend the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4, which earned one of the highest overall scores (4.8) of any shoe we’ve tested at GGR. 

Construction & Durability: 5/5

Appearance & Design: 5/5

Value: 5/5

Why We Like the Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4

Expert product tester Kate Meier, NASM-CPT, USAW-L1, CF-L1, put the Ultraventure 4s through the paces on all types of terrain and came away highly impressed by their construction and durability. Featuring a breathable upper, tacky rubber outsole, and stable ZipFoam midsole, these shoes earned a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in this category. 

“The toe box is pretty wide, but it’s not tall, so you have enough room to move your toes for grip but your foot remains in place,” Kate told me. “All in all, I love this construction for its intended purposes, and it’s still light enough that it does well on the road.” 

Trail running inherently presents more of a challenge than road running when it comes to stability due to the varied surfaces and obstacles you encounter. Thankfully, the Ultraventure 4s perform well on various types of terrain, allowing you to run with confidence. 

“I feel incredibly stable in these,” Kate told me, rating the stability and performance at a 5 out of 5. “The midsole is what you’d call ‘medium soft,’ so it has enough give during each foot strike to feel comfortable but enough support that you’re not overpronating.” 

The $155 price point may seem steep, but we believe it’s well worth it. Kate also gave a perfect score for value, especially since Topo Athletic offers a 30-day risk-free trial where you can send the shoes back if you aren’t satisfied. 

“This shoe offers fantastic durability, stability, and versatility for the price,” she told me.

Alternatives

Although Kate gave the Ultraventure 4s a 5 out of 5 for appearance and design, it’s worth noting that you have much more limited colorway options (just four) in comparison to traditional running shoes. Still, she loves her all-white pair, noting that all four colorways give the appearance of a great athletic shoe. 

To no surprise, these aren’t exactly the most versatile shoes on this list. While Kate wore them for a few cross-training workouts, this wouldn’t be her go-to choice for weightlifting. 

“I think you can wear these to cross-train, but if you want to lift some serious weight and need the hard feedback that weightlifting shoes provide, then I’d pass over these,” she told me, rating the versatility at a 4 out of 5. “And yes, you could wear these around the town, but I wouldn’t because there is no reason to degrade the tread unnecessarily.”

Trail running enthusiasts can check out our dedicated roundup for more options, but if we had to suggest an alternative to the Ultraventure 4s, we’d go with the Brooks Cascadia 19, which comes in a fully waterproof version.

Testing Breakdown

The Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 earned one of the highest overall scores of any pair of running shoes we’ve tested. In fact, the only area where it lost a point was versatility, which shouldn’t be a surprise since these are designed specifically for trail running. 

Vs. The Average

The Topo Athletic Ultraventure 4 is about the same price as the average running shoe. Given its trail-oriented design, it’s slightly heavier and features a lower heel-to-toe drop.

At a Glance 

• Maximum cushioning
• High heel-to-toe drop
• High-abrasion rubber outsole
• Built for road running

As a lifelong Nike fan, I’m all about the “Just Do It” motto. And if you’re a brand loyalist looking for the best Swoosh-adorned running shoe, we recommend the Vomero Plus. Featuring excellent cushioning and a 10-millimeter heel-to-toe drop, these shoes can be ideal for longer mileage at a slower pace, according to GGR Editor Ben Emminger, NASM-CNC, NASM-CSNC. He rated them a 4.5 out of 5 for comfort.

“There’s a definite sense of ‘plus’ underfoot with these, and I’ve really enjoyed the performance during longer-distance days or sessions where I’m just pacing along without really wanting to hit a PR or specific split,” he told me. 

Appearance & Design: 4.5/5

Adjustments & Comfort: 4.5/5

Value: 3/5

Why We Like the Nike Vomero Plus

To no surprise, the Vomero Plus made a strong initial impression based purely on looks. 

“I have the White/Volt/Barely Volt/Black colorway and they’re a very clean look that matches my style,” Ben told me. “I’ve always been a fan of Nike aesthetics and feel their running shoes often blend best in non-training situations.” 

Available in 13 colorways with a good variety of minimalist designs and more vibrant options alike, these shoes earned a near-perfect appearance and design score of 4.5 out of 5.

Of course, looks don’t matter if the shoe doesn’t perform well. Ben quells any concerns about that by awarding dual 4-out-of-5 ratings for construction and durability and performance and stability. One of his favorite design features is the soft engineered mesh upper that gives the shoes a comfortable overlay that’s still structured enough for regular training. He also appreciates the chunky ZoomX midsole, which he describes as “plush and cozy,” making it ideal for slower days on the track. 

“I’m more of a neutral gait or even supinate at times, but I didn’t have any issues with instability here,” Ben told me. “The ZoomX foam provides a good cradle and I feel the upper has enough structure to keep me in-check (even at longer distances).” 

Alternatives

Make no mistake about it: the Vomero Plus is expensive. The list price of $180 is steep compared to your typical daily trainers, though Ben points out that it’s on par with max-cushioned running shoes. Still, as is the case with most Nike products, you’re paying a premium for branding. 

“I do think these look great and they’re plenty comfortable, but for regular training needs or those that aren’t fully invested in switching up paces for different training goals, I feel there are more suitable options on the market,” Ben says, rating the value at 3 out of 5. 

The Vomero Plus also lacks some of the versatility we see in other shoes on this list. While they’re excellent for recovery days and long-distance running or walking, we wouldn’t recommend them for other types of training. As such, we rate the versatility at a modest 3 out of 5.

“The 10.3-ounce weight is not conducive to sprint intervals, and I’m always hesitant to recommend a high-stack height for treadmill running,” Ben told me. “The Vomero Plus has too much of a pillow-like effect underfoot to warrant strength training wear, too.”

If you can afford to splurge, the HOKA Bondi 9s are similarly priced and offer better versatility than the Vomero Plus. They also earned a high rating for appearance and design.

Testing Breakdown

The Nike Vomero Plus fared well in most categories, though it fell a bit short for versatility and value. Here’s a complete rundown of how it fared based on our testing methodology.

Vs. The Average

The Vomero Plus cost nearly $30 more than the average running shoe, putting them in the premium category. We do appreciate that the company offers a 60-day return policy for Nike Club members, which is longer than most brands. 

At a Glance 

• Amazingly lightweight
• High cushion
• Low heel drop 
• Great for daily training and everyday wear

The first step when you want to start running is to get a reliable pair of shoes. If you’re at the beginning of your journey, we recommend the Altra Experience Flow 2s, which can easily take you from tempo runs to running errands and everything in between. At just over 8 ounces per shoe (about 1.3 ounces less than the average), these lightweight daily trainers also boast an attractive aesthetic that impressed GGR expert product tester and USATF-certified running coach Kristen Geil. 

“I think you could wear any colorway with everyday clothes,” she told us, rating the appearance and design at a perfect 5 out of 5. 

Construction & Durability: 5/5

Appearance & Design: 5/5

Value: 4/5

Why We Like the Altra Experience Flow 2

Like many Altra shoes we’ve tested, the Experience Flow 2s are built with longevity in mind. 

“The wear and tear so far has been minimal—just a couple of minor grass stains that are par for the course with a white shoe,” Kristen told me, rating the construction and durability at 5 out of 5.

The engineered mesh upper is quite breathable, too, providing good air flow and temperature control. These also feature an “extra wide and roomy” toe box—a trademark of Altra shoes. 

“This allows your toes to ‘splay’ out so you can move more naturally,” Kristen told me. “This is an area in which these shoes really excel.” 

Meanwhile, one of our other product testers also had high praise for the Experience Flow 2’s design, particularly when it comes to the rubber outsole’s reinforced tread pattern that can provide extra stability. 

“I’ve tried these on pavement in both wet and dry conditions and the traction is nice,” our tester told me. “They even squeak sometimes on the concrete if I turn quickly…solid!” 

Overall, we rate the stability and performance at a perfect 5 out of 5.

Alternatives

Although the Experience Flow 2s earned perfect scores for stability and construction, Kristen cautions that Altra’s description of the cushioning may not be completely accurate.

“In my experience, it feels more neutral. I would recommend this cushioning for short, casual runs or walks—nothing too long or too demanding,” she says, rating the versatility at a 3.5 out of 5. “I wouldn’t have minded a little bit more underfoot.”

Also, some customers have called out the lack of breathability in the Experience Flow 2. Altra appears to have fixed this with the Experience Flow 3, however. We’ll report back with our findings once we’ve tested the updated version.

For the same price, the TYR Maverick-V1 Runner could also work well as a daily training shoe. However, like the Experience Flow 2, they’re not the most versatile option. 

Testing Breakdown

Other than versatility and value, the Altra Experience Flow 2 posted at least a 4.5 out of 5 in every other category we tested. Here’s a complete scoring breakdown. 

Vs. The Average

The Altra Experience Flow 2 is right around the same price as the average running shoe. We also like that Altra provides a 90-day return policy, giving you ample time to put these kicks to the test.